Am I Better Off Investing In Houses Or Units?

20th
2009

This post was written by Martin Bell @ mrd
Posted Under: From the desk @ mrd

What Or Where?

I am repeatedly asked: “Am I Better Off Investing In Houses Or Units? “Personally, I tend to invest in units (apartments), rather than houses because I am more interested in where I invest rather than what I invest in.

Did you just pick up that the real question is “where” not “what”?

Readers of Nick’s weekly newsletter would know that we place huge importance on the laws of supply and demand. Whether oil, bananas (remember Cyclone Larry in 2007 and what that did to the price of bananas?), property or anything else, supply and demand will ultimately determine all long term pricing (NB: There may be short term “blips” along the way).

I’m 100% Convinced

I am totally convinced that the areas most likely to deliver the better ongoing capital gain are those locations close to infrastructure and services; such as shops, hospitals, employment, transport and so on. An exception to this “rule” is where a property is located in an area with a WOW factor; like near the ocean or overlooking a golf course.

Infrastructure Rules

It was Michael Matusik who recently said that “infrastructure rules“; that’s where the best capital growth is to be found.

Land in areas that I like to target is simply too valuable to use to construct houses. You will not find a new housing estate opening up anywhere close to an infrastructure hub.

As a “set ‘n’ forget” investor, I find apartments and townhouses to be a lot easier to look after; but that’s another story.

What, Where OR WHY?

By extrapolating this logic out further; we can argue that it is not a question of what should I be buying, or where should I buy; but rather WHY!

You see, it’s the outcome (a favourable result) that I am really chasing. The “what” and/or the “where” merely form part of my strategy to achieve the desired outcome.

What Is Your WHY?

In my case, I bought 13 properties to create an equity base sufficient to support my family, without the need for me to continue working. Capital growth is where my focus firmly remained and three years ago, my dream became my reality and I retired.

Billabong & Rip Curl Open Shops In Alice Springs

… and If you believe that, I have a bridge for sale in Sydney!

Please understand that when you become a property investor, you become a business owner.

Would living in Alice Springs be justification enough for opening a surf shop there?

No, of course not; that would be a very stupid business decision!

To knowingly open a business in one location when another would have resulted in more profits defies all reason. Surely you would want your business operating in the locality that gave you the best chance of success.

I was living in Adelaide when I secured my first investment property. It was in Brisbane.

Why? Because the Australian Bureau of Statistics had population projections at the time showing a 1.6% growth for Adelaide and 78% for Brisbane!

Where was my new “business” venture likely to enjoy the greater success?

To achieve my capital growth goals sooner, I wanted property in areas of limited supply (little available land) with increasing long term demand (population growth).

Why Queensland?

The National Housing Supply Council has just released a report, from which I have included the following exerpts.

By 2028, the number of households in Australia is projected to be 11.4 million – an increase of 3.1 million in the underlying demand for dwellings over the 20-year period from 2008

National Housing Supply Council State of Supply Report – Additional households by region for low, medium and high household growth scenarios, 2008–28 as at 30 June

Low growth scenario (The low household growth scenario assumes that age and sex-specific net migration rates (overseas and interstate) for each region as observed in the period 2001–06 are maintained, with total net overseas migration increasing from around 120,000 a year in 2008 to around 160,000 a year in 2028)

  • NSW total – 500,000
  • Victoria total – 722,000
  • Queensland total – 1,090,000 (of which 825,000 are in SE Qld)
  • WA total – 357,000
  • SA total – 134,000
  • Tasmania total – 45,000
  • NT – 22,000
  • ACT – 31,000

So, based on the above, where will the greatest “demand” for my business be?

Under the low growth scenario, the greatest numbers of additional dwellings would be required in south-east Queensland; 41,000 per year compared to just 15,000 per year in Sydney or 14,000 per year in Perth.

It was important for me to leave my emotions out of my decision making. I simply could not argue with the figures. Yes, people who invest in property in Adelaide, Perth and Hobart and so on are likely to make money. Based on these figures, however, it is clear that to have invested in my own hometown would have been a higher risk strategy.

I freely admit to being a lazy investor. I want the best outcomes with the least input and the least risk! I assume that you feel the same way!

rental-yields-88-08

This same report reveals that average rental yields are also on the way up. They are higher for units/apartments than they are for houses.

Over the past six years, rental vacancy rates have fallen. This suggests that total returns on rental housing investment have not been sufficient to ensure supply keeps pace with demand; despite significant capital gains over the same period.

Very low vacancy rates have caused rental growth to accelerate over the past two years.

The dwelling rent component of the Consumer Price Index (CPI) measures average growth across all rental housing; which was 8% over the year to June 2008

Rents on new leases have been growing even faster, suggesting that overall rental growth is set to continue.

That deals with increasing demand but what about supply? Will there be a shortage or glut?

We have previously shown the graph below, but it’s worth revisiting it.

rental-shortage
WOW! This shows a SHORTAGE of around 100,000 dwellings this year, climbing to almost 120,000 in 2010. Significant dwelling stock shortages are anticipated to prevail until at least 2018!

Jack Of All Trades But Master Of None

None of us can be an expert in all areas. I have been an investor for more than 10 years. I have assisted numerous others with their investment needs for much of this time; still:

  • I do not deal with banks; I have an expert broker to do that
  • I do not prepare my own tax return; I have a great accountant for that
  • I do not research my own property; I leverage off the efforts of experts (such as mrd) for that too
  • I do not have the time or inclination to travel around looking for the best place to operate my “business”. I chose to surround myself with a competent, trustworthy team of professionals to work with me. It wasn’t always as easy (in my early days) as Nick & Katrina have made it today.

Bobcat Operator Or Train Driver

Maybe your property investing experience has been as challenging as it would be to operate a bobcat on the side of a steep, rocky hill. I liken the mrd Customer Care Program to a railway line on flat ground. One is difficult, challenging and risky – the other is pretty much a ‘no-brainer’; you just have to decide to get started and complete your journey.

So, whether you are yet to get started on your investment journey or you have become derailed somewhere along the way; mrd is here to help. Your best starting point is to have us prepare a complimentary, no obligation Finance Structure & Cash Flow Health Check. more…

Happy Investing,

Martin Bell
mrd Customer Care Program… because investing is personal

STOP PRESS! See also: Investing: Units vs Houses – Depreciation Differences

Bookmark and Share
How To Prosper And Retire On Your Real Estate Equity

Reader Comments

You guys are fantastic! you make the world more positive when I read your news letters and also so full of information I find so useful. I have 1 inv property through Doug and reading your news letters gives me so much confidence to continue.
Keep up the great work
Nick

#1 
Written By Nick S on March 21st, 2009 @ 10:38 am

Nick could u cover off on your views if/will the Feds remove our great negative gearing tax breaks…..cheers Tim

#2 
Written By Tim B on March 23rd, 2009 @ 3:26 pm

Hi Tim
Property investors provide rental accommodation. Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute research (back in February 2006) found that 54% of all those experiencing housing affordability problems are in the private rental market.
It is not going to get any easier for private renters if investors move out of property investment because negative gearing is limited or removed.
When negative gearing was removed in 1985, there were disastrous consequences for the property market and people trying to rent. Rents rose 37% across Australia and by 57% in Sydney. For this reason, negative gearing was reintroduced in 1987. Can you see them doing that again in this tight rental market?
The net non-taxable loss on rental property to the Commonwealth in 2002/03 was $1.3 billion. However, directly related property revenue received by all three levels of Government (Commonwealth, State, Local) exceeded $22.4 billion. Residential property investors are not getting a ‘free ride’ from Government: they contribute substantially to the coffers of every level of Government, and provide much needed private sector rental accommodation.
The group of people able to remove negative gearing are democratically-elected politicians. It’s highly unlikely that such a person will remove a policy that benefits so many, particularly when it’s a Labour government and renters are one of groups that benefit.
Both sides of politics have acknowledged the importance and value of negative gearing. In 2003 when the subject last surfaced as an issue, then Opposition Leader Simon Crean remembered the consequences of 1985, saying the removal of negative gearing would have “serious consequences” for the building industry.
Prime Minister John Howard was even more damning, describing the abolition of negative gearing as “just one of those crazy ideas that people who don’t understand the economy play with”.
I really don’t think it’s very likely- especially given the state of the building industry at this time . It would in my opinion be a “nail in the coffin”.
See also http://www.ypim.com.au//d
Martin Bell

#3 
Written By Replies @ mrd on March 23rd, 2009 @ 3:29 pm

Hi Tim,

Thanks for your great question; it’s one we are asked from time to time. I note that Martin has already provided a thorough answer so I won’t repeat what he has said. I would like to add one thought, however.

Even if negative gearing were to be abolished (and I agree that this is most improbable for all the reasons Martin gave); it would not be retrospective. Therefore, should such a change ever be introduced, it would only affect future investment property purchases.

My suggestion to anybody who is genuinely concerned that a future government may abolish depreciation from investment properties is to buy up as many as they can now, before they do (but I don’t really believe this is necessary… nor is there any reason to panic).

Have a wonderful day Tim & thanks again for your question.

Nick

#4 
Written By Replies @ mrd on March 23rd, 2009 @ 3:30 pm

Hi Martin,

Thanks for another easy-to-read article based on positive facts. I have always believed House & Land to be better than units or townhouses. So much so, that I have several in my current portfolio. However, after meeting yourself and talking about your own experience with different types of property that have enabled you to “retire” several years ago, I now agree with the MRD philosophy of supply and demand drives prices rather than property types.
This type of article helps validate my recent decision to purchase units through MRD.
Lets hope that history repeats itself sooner rather than later, so that I and other MRD clients can be “retired” early like yourself.

Best regards,

Chris V

#5 
Written By Chris on March 23rd, 2009 @ 4:32 pm

Hi Nick,

Thanks for taking the time to comment and for the positive feedback.
I will pass on your comments to both Nick and Doug.

Please don’t hesitate to contact us if we can be of further assistance in your investment property journey.

Warm regards,
Rod.

#6 
Written By Replies @ mrd on March 24th, 2009 @ 2:02 pm

Add a Comment

required, use real name
required, will not be published
optional, your blog address